Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
The Shipping Industry
Caribbean
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

LETTER OF THE DAY - More problems for Jamaican women
published: Tuesday | October 4, 2005

THE EDITOR, Sir:

I WAS really surprised and alarmed to read that there is a proposed amendment to the Maintenance Act to allow men the right to claim maintenance from their wives or common-law spouses. Dr. Glenda Simms is quoted as saying "you can't have one-sided equality" but that is precisely what black women across the diaspora have and which will be further perpetuated in Jamaica by this act.

In Western countries, where such an act is in force, the norm has been for the (white) male to work and support his wife/partner whilst she foregoes her career to stay at home and care for the children and home. The implementation of such an equality act in those countries recognises the wife's contribution and sacrifices in kind, the child-rearing, etc., when a relationship breaks down and gives the wife an entitlement to a share of the husband's wealth.

What is currently happening in such countries (I know of several instances in England and the U.S.) is that black women, who are generally more ambitious and hard-working than their men, are doing quite well for themselves. You then have men who sweet talk them into moving into their (the woman's) home and then using the law to claim a proportion of the woman's assets. Many of these men have not contributed financially nor done any child-rearing, etc. In fact, in general, the woman has to hold down a job and do all the homemaking. Where is the fairness in that?

Dr. Simms is also quoted as saying, "we don't want a lopsided justice", but that is precisely what this act would further create. Black women, on the whole, have never had the luxury of being able to stay at home and be supported by their men and since when have men taken equal share of housework and childcare?

People in Jamaica should not seek to copy all the laws and so-called 'improvements and developments' from Western countries, as some of them are flawed. Jamaican women have always had a burden to bear and I see the passing of this amendment as a further millstone for them.

I would like my remarks conveyed to Dr. Simms and to Attorney-General Nicholson for their comments.

I am, etc.,

BEULAH COOMBS

bcoombs@lambethcollege.ac.uk

Thornton Heath, Surrey

England

Via Go-Jamaica

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories

















© Copyright 1997-2005 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner