Sunday | April 28, 2002
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Religion
Arts &Leisure
Outlook
In Focus
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Free Email
Guestbook
Personals
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Cover story - Getting old on the job


- Rudolph Brown

They may be old, but these hands work just as well as those which are younger. Sometimes the intellect behind it is even better.

Avia Ustanny, Freelance Writer

SHOULD THE age of retirement be lowered so that those who are older will leave paid employment quicker, and the younger Jamaicans who are unemployed can get a chance to work? The thought is not far below the mind's surface in many of the young and the unemployed, it appears. Older Jamaicans who are nearing or past retirement, but still seen in the workplace, were labelled 'dinosaurs who are blocking our progress', by a number of young individuals in an informal survey conducted by Outlook in the last week.

The attitude is symptomatic of the change in culture in society, and in the workplace itself. Here, there is a decline in the high status one associated with age, a decrease in veneration, in respect is noticeable.

The emerging culture states that the fear of technology exhibited by many older persons, their unwillingness to change old ways of getting work done are just some of the reasons why they should shuffle out of the way.

The most compelling one, the young say, is the fact that so many of them are sitting at home unemployed. Something needs to give, they say. Specifically, some say, the old need to give way.

The failure of those who are older to participate in monitoring relationships with younger members of the workforce may also be a contributor to feelings of resentment on the part of those who are younger.

The attitudes of employers are also changing. The trademark loyalty of the old is no longer as valuable as it used to be, it seems.

It most be noted that older workers are also more expensive to hire. In the 1997 publication, 'The Future of Career Development', American writer Bettina Lankard Brown, notes this and states that "The workplace of the future will continue to be youth focused. In a youth-oriented society, diminishing value has been placed on wisdom and experience ­ two qualities descriptive of older workers. As a result, companies have used economics to guide their decisions to replace older, more expensive workers with younger, cheaper ones. Into the next century, there may be some serious ramifications of such 'ageism' biases."

There is one myth that can be debunked. It is not true that the oldest of workers enjoy greater job security than new school leavers. The 2000 Social and Economic Survey shows this.

The two group which in 2000 displayed the lowest employment rates (with increases of less than 1 per cent) were 14-19-year-olds which represented the smallest share in employment (3.9 per cent) and the 55-64 age group which rose by the equally low percentage.

The survey pointed out that in a contracting labour market like Jamaica persons in the retirement zone are heavily represented among displaced workers. In 2000, the largest percentage decline in the labour force occurred among those aged 65 and over which fell by 3.8 per cent.

This week, Outlook examines the role of ageing Jamaicans in the workforce, attitudes towards them, and ask if they need to make themselves more marketable in a youth-oriented culture. Do they need to manage their careers in such a way that they enjoy better relationships with those who are younger?

Should the age of retirement be lowered?

  • Stacie Bell, 18: "I believe that people should retire when the time comes to allow younger people with new vision and vitality to occupy the space, so that the thousands of young people that are unemployed may have jobs. If they haven't found what they were looking for in all those years, I fail to think they are going to find it again!"

  • Sharon Stine26: "I don't think old people should leave just to make way for the young, but if they are decrepit, they should go, because incompetence at any age is unacceptable."

  • Hortecia Brown, 21: "I don't think so. The people in 50s and 60s are no problem, they more than anybody else help us to become integrated into working areas, showing us the ropes. I think the people that have the biggest problem are the middle-aged people, people between 30 and 45 who feel threatened by input of new blood. Working at a hotel, my supervisor was 35 and she was such a terror everybody scared of her because she was there the longest. If she didn't like you, you have to leave. She finally caused me to lose my job. Older people who were in the job were so nice. You know how grandparents make better parents than parents? Working people do get better with age. It is those in their mid-age crisis, they are such such b..."

  • Leica Baron, 23: "I don't really think so because they have bills to pay and their families to look after. I don't know. There are some miserable and mean, but then there are others who really look out for you."

  • Sharon Green: "My opinion is that they should not retire earlier sometimes as they are the main income earners for their families and retirement money is nothing to live off. They are still working because they do not have a choice. My mother wants to retire early but she can't because she is looking after me."

    Names changed as requested

    Back to Outlook





  • In Association with AandE.com

    ©Copyright 2000-2001 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions