Letterman 'extortionist' wants case dropped

Published: Wednesday | November 11, 2009



LETTERMAN

NEW YORK (AP):

A LAWYER for the TV news producer accused of blackmailing talk-show host David Letterman plans to ask a judge to dismiss an extortion case that prompted the late-night comic to acknowledge affairs with staffers.

Robert J. Halderman was due in a Manhattan court yesterday. His defence attorney, Gerald Shargel, said he planned to challenge whether the evidence presented to a grand jury was sufficient and ask a judge to dismiss the attempted first-degree grand larceny charge against his client.

Challenging grand jury evidence is a common first defence step in New York criminal cases.

Shargel wouldn't discuss details of his argument in advance of the court appearance, Halderman's first, since being released on US$200,000 bail last month in the headline-grabbing case.

Prosecutors said Halderman left a bizarre and threatening package in Letterman's car on September 9, demanding US$2 million to keep quiet about some of the Late Show host's dalliances. The materials included a letter, a synopsis of a supposed screenplay that said Letterman's world would "collapse around him" when information about his private life was disclosed, photos, personal correspondence and portions of a diary, authorities said.

Phoney phone call

The diary entries were allegedly written by Halderman's former girlfriend and outlined her affair with Letterman.

Authorities then taped two conversations between Letterman's lawyer and Halderman - including an exchange in which the lawyer gave Halderman a phoney US$2 million check, the Manhattan District Attorney's office said. Halderman was arrested after depositing it, prosecutors said.

The day before prosecutors unveiled the case last month, Letterman divulged it on his show, acknowledging he had had sex with women who worked for him.

Halderman, 51, a producer for CBS's 48 Hours Mystery news magazine, has pleaded not guilty. He could face five to 15 years in prison if convicted.

 
 
 
The opinions on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent. To respond to The Gleaner please use the feedback form.