FIFA's Warner returns England's WCup bid gift

Published: Sunday | November 8, 2009



Warner

LONDON (AP):

FIFA vice-president Jack Warner returned a luxury handbag provided for his wife by England's World Cup bid team because of the "embarrassment" caused by the subsequent fallout.

Warner, one of 24 FIFA executive members who will vote next year on the World Cup hosts for 2018 and 2022, received the $380 Mulberry bag during a visit to London last month and originally thought it was to mark his wife's birthday.

England, who are primarily targeting the 2018 tournament, now has no plans to distribute the other 23 bags to the FIFA voters.

gifts to officials

FIFA guidelines tell bidding countries that gifts can only be provided to FIFA officials that have "symbolic or incidental value" and Warner accepts this was the case.

"I believe this was a very innocuous gift given by the FA to my wife for her birthday that led to her being embarrassed by the English media," Warner said. "It was just a symbolic gift and was completely unsolicited- it didn't matter if it cost two or 200 pounds.

"As far as I am concerned, my wife is sacrosanct and I want no part of anything that affects her, so we decided to return the bag and she did so yesterday morning."

The British media and opposition Conservative Party had questioned the wisdom of providing the handbag last month.

"We have always sought to act within the laws laid down by FIFA during the bidding process and we will continue doing so," the bid team said.

During Warner's visit to London for the Leaders in Football Conference he described England's bid as "lightweight".

England will discover in December next year whether it will host the World Cup for the first time since 1966.

Also, the United States, England, Australia, Russia and Japan plus joint proposals from Belgium-Netherlands and Spain-Portugal are bidding for either the 2018 or 2022 World Cup.

Qatar and South Korea have applied for only the 2022 tournament.

 
 
 
The opinions on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent. To respond to The Gleaner please use the feedback form.