I refer to The Sunday Gleaner article under the headline 'Unregistered draughtsmen bad for business'. Here we have a demonstration of a situation where we could say that 'the law is not a shackle'.

The Architect's Registration Law was promulgated in 1986, but only ratified in 2005. But that fact has really no relevance. This law protects the title of architect, but not his work!

In effect, as explained by Minister Robert Montague, the parish councils, who are the authorities with the power to grant building approval, are guided by the provisions of the Parish Council Act and the Town and Country Planning Act, which authorises the acceptance of plans prepared, basically, by anybody.

They are not mandated by the Architects Registration Law. Therefore, one may ask: What is the purpose of that law, if it cannot be enforced, to supersede previous laws?

It would be useful to clarify that the reason architects are demanding the application of the law is not just to fill their pockets with high fees demanded.

An architect has to go through six years of study at a recognised university. After completing their academic studies, they have to complete two years of apprenticeship with a registered architect, and sit for an examination before being accepted as a registered architect.

All these years of study and practice enable the architect to produce buildings of quality and safety in an environment that is adding to the quality of life. That is the primary goal of every design.

I look forward to the time when we can harmonise all existing laws, in order to allow us to give our best to society in a well-regulated environment.

I am, etc.,

LOUISE MCLEOD

Past president of the Jamaican

Institute of Architects

Kingston