Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Social
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News



Company review - Rural Water Supply Limited, poor accountability
published: Friday | May 30, 2008

Transparent, Business Writer

Carib Engineering Corporation Limited (CEC), started April 1983, is wholly owned by the government and was set up to implement the Yallahs Pipeline Project that was meant to be the first phase of the Blue Mountain Water Supply Programme.

CEC's role was later expanded to include responsibility for island wide supply schemes, and eventually changed its name to become Rural Water Supply Limited (RWS).

Water supply

In 2004, then Minister of Water and Housing, Donald Buchanan, reported that: "Ninety-eight per cent of urban Jamaica is supplied with an adequate supply of water, while only 85 per cent of rural Jamaica has access to what is called the improved water sources."

Two years later, in 2006, Buchanan announced that 77 per cent of Jamaicans have access to potable water and that RWS would work to give all communities access to piped water by 2010.

How does one reconcile these numbers?

In 2008, Dr Horace Chang, the current minister of housing and water, estimated that only 50 per cent of rural communities have access to potable water but said that would change by 2015.

This leaves us wondering who makes these estimates and why has the projection changed?

Is a master plan being developed only now? Why did RWS originally project that rural communities would have water by 2010 with no apparent master plan? Residents of rural Jamaica must be quite confused about whether they have potable water or not.

RWS is a big company. Between 1999 and 2004, it undertook 37 projects, totalling $3.2 billion.

The Ministry of Housing, Transport, Water and Works was granted more than $264 million for its rural water supply project in the 2007/08 estimates of Expenditure. The 2008/09 Estimates has a bigger allocation of $394 million.

LATE ACCOUNTS

The last audited accounts for RWS, signed by auditor Lee Clarke Chang in August 2006, are supposedly for the period ending March 2006, even though page 19 of the accounts incorrectly announces 2005.

The annual report, though attractive, fails to state board membership and is filled with pictures of then ministers and senior management, under the direction of Judith Reid (earnings $3.6 million per annum). Noel Donaldson is the current chairman.

Work-in-progress consisted of over 30 projects. The largest was Darliston Water Supply Scheme that had cost about $180 million. This appears to cover phase two of the project that improves water supply to Whithorn, Caledonia, Darliston, Long Hill, Ashton, Bognie, Salem and Petersville - areas largely in Eastern Westmoreland, the seat held by former Prime Minister PJ Patterson up to his resignation from political office.

In March 2006, RWS had a net worth of $27 million, cash and investments of $51 million, revenue of $23 million, subject to tax and made a profit after tax of $5 million. Tax losses to be used against future profits were $19 million.

By May 2008, RWS should have published its March 2007 accounts and be in audit for 2008. Delays give it a bad rating on accountability to the public.

STATUTORY DEDUCTION ARREARS

In spite of its relatively strong cash position, RWS appears to have been a bit naughty by not paying over statutory contributions on time. Some $9.6 million was owed on these contributions compared to an annual salary bill of only $12 million. Does the $9.6 million include relevant fines and penalty?

No details are given of the $17 million 'restated loss' shown in the accounts for 2004 although this probably relates to the transition to the laborious IFRS standards.

DELINQUENT REGISTRATION

A check at the Companies Office of Jamaica, formerly the Registrar of Companies, demonstrates that RWS has not updated its corporate records since inception in 1983. The registrar shows the company being owned by Jamaica National Investment Company and one John Williams of Ocean Boulevard, Kingston, and its board as Messrs Abrahams, Clarke, Davidson, Minler, Stockhausen (two persons of similar name shown as directors), and Williams.

This failure to update corporate records is unacceptable.

business@gleanerjm.com

SUGGESTIONS

1 Annual reports are the traditional way in which a company demonstrates transparency and holds itself accountable to its shareholders. If the company is government- owned then substitute the public for the shareholders.

The RWS 2006 report falls far short of this. There is no indication of the final cost of projects with comparison to budgets of cost and time to completion. There is no reason stated for its delinquency in making statutory payments. The identity of the board is not disclosed. The wrong year end date is carelessly printed. RWS must get its audited accounts published more speedily.

2 One wonders why Minister Chang is empowering this company with massive additional funds - $260 million at least - when its public accounting and registration records are not up to date. A prudent minister should not give additional financial responsibilities to a company that cannot keep current records.

3 The managing director of RWS might next year include details of how each project total costs compared with estimates, and when each project was approved by the National Contracts Commission.

4 Minister Chang might consider advising the public on the criteria used to decide on the priority given in choosing the area to benefit from an improved water supply. Looking at the projects worked on by RWS one cannot but feel that priority is influenced more by politics rather than public need. It would be nice to change that.

5 Why does the Rural Water Supply Company have its office in New Kingston?

The last audited accounts for RWS, signed by auditor Lee Clarke Chang in August 2006, are supposedly for the period ending March 2006, even though page 19 of the accounts incorrectly announces 2005.

GRADE REASONS

AccountabilityVery PoorAccounts more than 15 months late and registration 25 years late.

Content of ReportPoorReport does not allow the public to assess efficiency of company.

More Business



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner