Monday | November 19, 2001
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Flair
Star Page
E-Financial Gleaner
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Free Email
Guestbook
Personals
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

In The House - Security or lack of it?

By Vernon Daley, Staff Reporter


Inside Gordon House. - File

ONE OF the unfortunate things about Jamaicans is our inability to see danger unless it's clear and present.

The flaw might be forgiven in the ordinary man but for those holding positions of leadership, I think its only reasonable that they should possess the foresight to head off disaster before it occurs.

Take, for example, the issue of security at Gordon House, the seat of the nation's Parliament. It might come as a surprise to some but up to a week and a half ago, a stranger could literally just walk right off the streets and into the building without being challenged.

All you had to do was look semi-decent and the policemen who stand at the entrance while the House is sitting wouldn't even as much as look at you suspiciously. And even when the metal detector sounds off as you push through the door, the noise was more an annoyance to them than it was a signal to check whether you had in your possession a weapon that might turn into some brutal account.

Are we serious?

The Parliament is the place in which on any given Tuesday we can find a fair number of the nation's political leaders. Can you even begin to wrap your mind around the possibility of Colombine-style shooting in Gordon House. Of course not. This is Jamaica, we don't have a history of killing our leaders. That would never happen here.

Well, that is apparently the attitude of the management of the Parliament and by the look of it, some of the Parliamentarians themselves. They just can't see the danger until it's clear and present.

How else can one explain the looseness in security that existed at the building up until recently. It's hard to imagine why security arrangements were not stepped up earlier when one considers that there was a reported firebomb attack just over seven weeks ago followed by a bomb threat four weeks later. And let's not forget that the building was actually firebombed in 1998, causing extensive damage to both the interior and exterior.

It took an article in this newspaper to highlight the problem before the number of security personnel were increased and more stringent checking instituted for strangers entering the building. The management of the Parliament and the nation's leaders ought to have been more alert about this very important issue.

We have been spared a tragedy despite this abysmal laxity. Will those responsible slip back into complacency? Another slip-up like this and we all might not be so lucky the next time.

Back to Lead Stories






























In Association with AandE.com

©Copyright 2000-2001 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions