Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News



Gatlin seeks injunction to run at US trials
published: Wednesday | June 11, 2008


GATLIN

AP :

Banned Olympic sprint champion Justin Gatlin filed a lawsuit in a last-ditch effort on Monday to compete at the United States Olympic athletics trials in less than three weeks.

The complaint alleges that penalising Gatlin for a 2001 doping violation, which involved medication he was taking for attention deficit disorder, violates the Americans with Disability Act.

Gatlin's lawyer, Joe Zarzaur, said they will request an injunction to allow him to compete at the trials, which begin on June 27 in Eugene, Oregon. He said he did not know when the case would be heard.

The suit was filed in US District Court in Gatlin's hometown of Pensacola, Florida.

Doping ban upheld

On Friday, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) upheld a four-year doping ban against the reigning Olympic 100-metre champ. Gatlin asked CAS to rescind the 2001 doping violation - his first of two - which he had hoped would reduce his penalty to a two-year ban, allowing him to compete at the trials.

Instead, CAS rejected that argument and changed the start of Gatlin's ban to July 25, 2006 - the day he voluntarily accepted his provisional suspension - instead of May 25, 2006. So he wouldn't be reinstated before the trials even if his ban had been reduced from four years to two.

Zarzaur said he also would ask the court to change the dates of the doping ban.

The 26-year-old Gatlin, who insists he never knowingly took performance-enhancing drugs, tested positive for excessive testosterone at the Kansas Relays in 2006.

Named as defendants in the suit are the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), USA Track and Field (USATF), the US Olympic Committee (USOC) and the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF).

USATF spokeswoman Jill Geer said the federation had to review the suit before commenting.

Another potential roadblock is jurisdiction. CAS secretary general Matthieu Reeb said on Friday the only legal option he knew of for Gatlin was to go before the Swiss Federal Tribunal, an appeal provided by Swiss law because CAS is based in Switzerland.

Anti-doping matter

"We view this as an anti-doping matter and believe the appropriate forum for adjudication and resolution is through the American Arbitration Association or the International Court of Arbitration for Sport," USOC spokesman Darryl Seibel said.

The contention that Gatlin's first doping ban violated the ADA was raised by a member of the US arbitration panel that reduced his ban from eight years to four in January. Christopher L. Campbell, in a dissenting opinion, called it "blatant discrimination".

The suit alleges the defendants never provided Gatlin with information that Adderall, the drug he was prescribed, or any other ADD medications "could pose drug testing issues for a USATF event".

While competing for the University of Tennessee, Gatlin would stop taking Adderall a few days before a meet and never had a positive test. He followed the same routine before competing at the 2001 junior nationals, according to the lawsuit, but tested positive there for amphetamines.

Gatlin was suspended from international competition for two years, but the sport's governing body reinstated him after one year.

Still, the IAAF warned Gatlin then that the 2001 incident counted as a doping violation and another would mean a lifetime ban.

More Sport



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner