Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
What's Cooking
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Sangster and the PSC
published: Thursday | January 31, 2008

The Editor, Sir:

In the matter of the Prime Minister's dismissal of the Public Service Commission (PSC), Dr Alfred Sangster, despite his lack of legal qualifications, has proclaimed that "The prime minister's position can be upheld in court."

Dr Sangster was a member of the PSC which was dismissed for supposed acts of 'misbehaviour'. In the face of such accusations, one might have thought that a sense of pride might have induced him to either remain quiet or defend his honour. The question arises, if Dr Sangster felt so strongly about the 'misbehaviour' of his colleagues, why didn't he say so before? Why now, when his erstwhile colleagues have launched a legal challenge to their dismissals? Why didn't Dr Sangster resign instead of waiting to be fired?

It is curious that Dr Sangster's public condemnation of his colleagues remarkably mirrors the views that have been vociferously propagated by the Farquharson Institute of Public Affairs (FIPA). It is my understanding that Dr Sangster is a former vice-chairman of this organisation.

Ground for dismissal

Like the FIPA, Dr Sangster charges that the PSC's 'failure' to reinstate Lackston Robinson, following the judgment of Mr Justice Jones, was a ground for dismissal. Curiously, the former academic fails to grasp that Mr Justice Jones' judgment does not contain any order of reinstatement.

According to Dr Sangster, the PSC ignored his entreaties to review their recommendation of Stephen Vasciannie for the position of Solicitor General, in light of Prof Vasciannie's 2002 criticism of Bruce Golding's return to the Jamaica Labour Party. Before being made aware of the criticism, Dr Sangster had himself considered Prof Vasciannie the best-qualified candidate for the post. It entirely escapes this esteemed member of the Order of Jamaica that Prof Vasciannie's commentary is entirely irrelevant to his qualifications for the post of Solicitor General. Unfortunately, Dr Sangster proves himself to be no different from so many Jamaicans who suspend critical thought to placate authority. If we really want Jamaica to change, we need Jamaicans like Dr Sangster to do differently.

I am, etc.,

O HILAIRE SOBERS

ohilaire@yahoo.com

Washington, DC

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner