Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Arts &Leisure
Outlook
In Focus
Social
Auto
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Environmental laws miss the mark
published: Sunday | January 20, 2008


Norman Grindley/Deputy Chief Photographer
Plastic bottles, improperly disposed of, pollute the shores of Kingston Harbour.

Gareth Manning, Sunday Gleaner Reporter

Although passed nearly 63 years ago, the Wildlife Protection Act fails to address something as simple, but critical, as the destruction of natural habitats - the main cause of wildlife decline in Jamaica, nature lobbyists point out.

"It is not a wildlife protection act. It really does not have as an objective to protect wildlife. It should have been called the Hunting Act, because what it does is regulates hunting," reasons environmentalist Peter Espeut. He says while hunting needs to be regulated and should, in fact, be part of the wildlife legislation, the current law is inadequate.

The same goes for the Endangered Species Act of 2000, the Watersheds Protection Act of 1963 and the Forest Act of 1996. Critics argue that these laws are not serving the purpose for which they were intended.

Intended purpose not served

The Endangered Species Act speaks only to trade in endangered species and not the protection of Jamaica's flora and fauna. It was formed only after Jamaica signed the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora in 2000. The Watersheds Protection Act, and the Forest Act, likewise, make no provision for the protection or even declaration of watersheds. So, while there appears to be laws addressing the environment, not many actually do.

"We have old legislation that is conflicting, but also some of the names are confusing," Espeut says.

Furthermore, he points out, enforcement by regulatory bodies is lacking where most laws are concerned, due in part, to the lack of resources - both human and financial. The ineffectiveness of environmental laws is also due to the absence of accompanying regulations. This, Espeut says, proves a challenge in managing areas declared protected under the Natural Resource Conservation Authority (NRCA) Act, especially, because there are hardly any specific regulations outlined to manage each area.

Enviro laws without teeth

  • Wildlife Protection Act - 1945

  • Mining Act - 1947

  • Beach Control Act - 1956

  • Town and Country Planning Act - 1958

  • Watersheds Protection Act - 1963

  • Fishing Industry Act - 1976

  • Natural Resources Conservation Authority Act - 1991

  • Forest Act - 1996

  • Endangered Species (Protection, Conservation and Regulation of Trade) Act - 2000

  • National Solid Waste Management Act - 2001

  • More News



    Print this Page

    Letters to the Editor

    Most Popular Stories






    © Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
    Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
    Home - Jamaica Gleaner