The Editor, Sir:
I recently attended a Jamaica investment symposium in South Florida and one panel included George Roper, deputy director of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and Antoinette McKain, CEO of the Jamaica Deposit Insurance Company.
The audience wasted no time during the Q&A segment to ask the questions to which many wanted answers. The first concern was roughly:
"I don't like the word 'schemes' to describe these investments; I call them 'opportunities'. Are these opportunities operating illegally and if so, why not shut them down? If not, leave them alone."
The answer was very clear. The FSC pointed out that it describes credit unions as "collective investment schemes". There is no negative connotation with the word "scheme" when they describe any financial company. More important, Mr. Roper pointed out that those schemes that have not applied for licenses are operating illegally based on present Jamaican law and would even be in violation in the U.S.A.
He explained that the U.S.A has a law stating that investment clubs are defined based on the maximum participation of people where every person is involved in the decisions regarding investments.
Partners
The definition of investment clubs and the SEC, according to the SEC Section on their website, is:
"An investment club is a group of people who pool their money to make investments. Usually, investment clubs are organised as partnerships and, after the members study different investments, the group decides to buy or sell based on a majority vote of the members.
"An investment club must register with the SEC as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 if all of the following three conditions apply:
1. The club invests in securities;
2. The club issues membership interests that are securities (see above), and
3. The club is not able to rely on an exclusion from the definition of investment company.
"For example, a "private investment company" may not need to register with the SEC. To qualify, an investment club: must not make, nor propose to make, a public offering of its securities, and must not have more than 100 members."
Investment decisions
Mr. Roper also pointed out that Jamaica, in fact, has no such exemption related to the size of the club. Clearly an "investment club" like OLINT, with far more than 100 members and no voting on investment decisions, would be required to register with the SEC in the U.S.A. and there is no difference for operations in Jamaica.
He made sure to point out that the FSC did in fact issue a cease and desist letter and that the matter was appealed and they await the court ruling in early December. They only have the power to issue the letter and turn over the matter to the Director of Public Prosecutions. The FSC cannot simply "shut them down".
He also explained why other "extremely high- yield" schemes like Cash Plus had only three options to be in compliance with the law. Any company or entity that is selling a security has to be licensed and the people selling that security to the public also have to be licensed.
In the FSC news release on Cash Plus on May 4, 2007 - http://www.fscjamaica.org/publicinfo_ files/bulletins/News release Cash Plus.pdf - the FSC defined "securities":
"Securities" include stocks, bonds, promissory notes, certificates of participation in profit-sharing agreements, investment contracts and documents commonly known as securities.
It is interesting that those who seek to say that the FSC is "bad mind" or that the financial institutions are conspiring against these schemes are the least knowledgeable on the subject and have not sought to educate themselves about Jamaican law, or even understand how the U.S.'s SEC would treat these schemes. Maybe the information above will have some material impact on the discussion.
I am, etc.,
DAVID MULLINGS
david.mullings@gmail.com
