The Editor, Sir:

Having regards to the way politics is practised in Jamaica, that in ways more than one it lacks credibility, integrity and authenticity, it should be enshrined in the national Constitution that both major political parties' manifestos be published the same day, and that the publication be done from the Parliament of the land, so that neither will have the chance of taking advantage of the policies and programmes of the other.

This approach would be beneficial to the populace and would rule out the possibility of plagiarism, as well as providing a platform of clear distinction in policy and form of the opposing parties by which informed decisions can be made.

When one is published in advance of the other, what we are likely to end up with are two of the same; and this is not helpful, but gives the false impression that neither is better than the other for both are saying the same. It's easy for the incumbent to play this game.

A comparison is being made between the manifesto of the JLP (which appeared first) and that of the PNP, but this is not fair to the JLP. The real measure should be a comparison between the 18-year administration and policies of the PNP and projected administration and policies of the JLP as set out in its manifesto. Otherwise, precedence must be given to the manifesto of the JLP over that of the PNP.

The PNP should not be vying for retention of power based on promises and projections, but on performance. On the other hand, the JLP cannot be defaulted for vying for power based on what it proposes to do given a chance, which of necessity must involve promises and projections.

Let's be honest. It is not the JLP's projections and promises which should receive the butt of criticism, but rather those of the PNP. Cognisant of the fact that these are all the JLP has to go by at this point in time, as against 18 years of service and performance by the PNP. It is legitimate that the JLP should show by its manifesto what it will do should it be given the privilege to form the next government.

The upcoming general election must be approached rationally, with eyes wide open, because it could be the most crucial since Independence, save the 1980 election.

This election could determine our future, whether we retain our democracy or be plunged into a one-party state dictatorship. We must keep democracy alive and well; and there is no better way of doing so than to change our government at intervals. This is the people's right.

Vote wisely; vote with your conscience. Vote as true patrons with genuine love for your country above love for personalities and parties.

I am, etc.,

REV. CYRIL CLARKE

Ebenezer Baptist Church

Osborne Store P.O.

Clarendon