Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Farmer's Weekly
What's Cooking
Caribbean
International
UWI/Eye on Science
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Podcasts
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Man incarcerated for six years freed
published: Thursday | October 19, 2006

The Court of Appeal on Tuesday freed a man who was incarcerated for six years because the presiding judge did not give adequate directions to the jury.

Clive Marriott, 37, of Glengoffe, St. Catherine, was not represented on appeal but the court reviewed the evidence and summation and freed him. The judges said they would not order a retrial because of the length of time Marriott had spent in prison.

The Court of Appeal comprising Mr. Justice Seymor Panton, Mr. Justice Algernon Smith and Mrs. Justice Hazel Harris, found that identification and credibility were important issues in the case.

The complainant testified that on the night of March 31, 1997 she was coming from a fair when a man she knew before offered to tow her on his bicycle. While on the way he took her to a house where he and three other men raped her. The complainant said that Marriott was one of the men who raped her.

After the ordeal, the complainant did not tell anyone about the incident. The complainant's mother heard about the incident four to five days later and asked her about it. A report was then made to the police. Marriott was arrested and charged in 2000 and he denied being involved in the incident.

The court said that the jurors were not given any direction on corroboration and based on the circumstances of the case such a direction should have been given.

More Lead Stories



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner