Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
The Shipping Industry
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

JPS missed the point
published: Tuesday | May 9, 2006

THE EDITOR, Sir:

THE JAMAICA Public Service Company's (JPS) April 27, attempt at clarification of the additional bill payment fee demanded of customers by Bill Express, their collection agent, missed the point of customers' complaint. Our complaint has to do with double charging us for the same service and JPS's apparent winking at Bill Express's inappropriate charge.

Irrespective of whether the additional fee is being collected on behalf of JPS is immaterial. The fact that JPS has allowed their agent to do so is relevant and highly questionable. JPS contracted with this collection agency to receive the customers' bill remittances of payments for which service JPS pays "a contractual fee for each bill payment collected on (its) behalf." The customer has no contract with Bill Express.

JPS admits that "the bills of customers reflect a customer charge, which includes bill collection costs". Many of us were not even aware that such a charge was included in our monthly bills. Nevertheless, if this is so, then it is obvious that Bill Express ought not be charging us for the same service for which JPS is already paying them. Moreover, we, the customers are also paying twice - the hidden JPS charge in our bills and the $35 per transaction fee demanded of each customer paying through Bill Express.

The additional charge, therefore, becomes an indirect increase in our utility costs without JPS et al., going to the regulatory authority for approval.

Is not Bill Express, therefore, in breach of the contracts agreed to and signed with JPS et al or did they tacitly agree to/with Bill Express extracting an additional collection fee for the service for which it was already receiving payment?

If Bill Express is in breach of those contractual agreements, then JPS et al., should have objected and, if necessary, terminated those contracts. It is true that we have other options for bill payments, but, if Bill Express is allowed to continue to attach this additional charge to our utility bills, it will only be a matter of time before the other collection agents follow suit.

Finally, I also note that Bill Express some time ago decided not to accept cheques for bill payments and to require those payments be made in cash only. Is this another "purely business decision by the collection agency as it seeks to recover costs."

I am, etc.,

CLINTON A. LEWIS

14 Turtle Beach Towers

Main Street

Ocho Rios, St. Ann

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner