Bookmark jamaica-gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

A disservice to the cricket team
published: Wednesday | March 12, 2003

THE EDITOR, Sir:

TO MANY of us in the West Indies, cricket is central to our being. For myself, it is critical to my mental health. When the West Indies team does well, I am fine and when it does badly, I am a man most miserable.

The performance of the team at the World Cup in South Africa is disappointing and in my opinion belies its talent. When an athlete or athletic team under-performs in the absence of physical injury, it is time to ask the sports psychologist for an explanation. This has become an urgent need in respect of the present West Indies team.

But psychological weakness is not the only explanation for under-performance. There may be many other explanations and I would like to focus on one of these, the issue of team selection. The exclusion of Jermaine Lawson from the team in South Africa requires an explanation from the chairman of team selection and maybe the manager. The Marlon Samuels issue requires no further ventilation, but likewise remains to be explained. It is on the chairman of team selection that I wish to focus at this time.

I detect, in the media and among colleagues, a reluctance to criticise Sir Vivian Richards, chairman of selectors of the West Indies cricket team. Despite the many 'column-inches' written in criticism of team selection, the name Vivian Richards is conspicuous by its absence, yet he is the chairman of selectors.

I have opposed the appointment of Sir Vivian ever since it was announced. It is my view that Sir Vivian does not possess the intellectual capacity for this job, which requires insight and perception beyond the skills of playing the game. Not all good players can make the transition from playing the game at the highest level to analysing, managing and developing the game also at the highest level. Not everyone can be a Michael Holding.

It is my view that Sir Vivian Richards has been promoted beyond his level of competence. His best role in West Indies cricket is as a specialist batting coach, not even as head coach, a job, which requires management skills and strategic understanding, which he does not possess.

We have done Sir Vivian and West Indies cricket a disservice by appointing him to a job for which he is not competent. The sooner we recognise this and correct it, the better.

I am, etc.,

RAINFORD WILKS

20 West Strathmore

Kingston 8

More Letters


















In Association with AandE.com

©Copyright 2000-2001 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner