THE EDITOR, Madam:
I HAVE always enjoyed reading the columns written by my erudite namesake, Professor Errol Miller, if for no other reason, than that they are always well reasoned.
Such was his column on Thursday, September 14, in which he argued that Merlene Ottey should be allowed to run in the 100 meters event.
While I won't take any sides on the issue, I would simply like to make one point and ask one question. My point is, no matter what the ultimate decision is, I am extremely disappointed at the manner in which Merlene is reported to have handled the possibility of not competing in the individual 100-metres event.
If the reports are correct, to threaten not to run in the relay, or to "go on vacation" if she is not chosen to run the 100 meters, to my mind is unbecoming of one whom the entire nation holds in such high esteem. Beyond everything else, the relay is a team event in which you are part of your national team.
To be honest, regardless of the outcome, for me, Merlene's glittering image has lost a little of its lustre. She does, however, still have a chance to reclaim it all by exhibiting the kind of national pride and decorum for which she is known around the world.
My question to Prof. Miller (and the others who support his view) is simply: What of the young woman who would be replaced, having earned the right to be there? How do you know that this won't be her only chance to line up for the 100 metres at an Olympic Games?
I will live with whatever the decision the team officials make, but somebody should remind our 'Queen of the Track', that the only person who should be holding a gun over anybody's head at the Olympics, is the official starter.
I am etc.,
ERROL K. MILLER
Cable & Wireless Jamaica
Kingston
