The Editor, Sir:

Being born in Jamaica and naturalised in the US, I am compelled to address the arguments over dual citizenship, Mr Vaz and public service.

Loyalty is not synonymous with citizenship. Throughout history of virtually every nation, there have been 'sole' citizens, whether by birth or naturalisation who have committed treason against that very country. Therefore, in my opinion, there is no need to renounce either citizenship. Mr Vaz renouncing in order to serve would be moot.

Can one person serve two flags? I believe one can. Provided there are no close security ties, espionage or conflicts of interest, you can be loyal to one and not be disloyal to the other. This is not a two-parent household where we choose mom's side or dad's side. As the child, we adore them both. We are dutiful to both. This symbiotic relationship would only become problematic should there be an intense rivalry or potential 'divorce' in which the child may have to choose a side.

The answer

The true answer lies within our pledge. "Before God and all mankind, I pledge the love and loyalty of my heart, the wisdom and courage of mind, the strength and vigour of my body, in the service of my fellow citizen."

The core definition of the word citizen is inhabitant of a city or country. Consequently, I feel Mr Vaz, and others like him who embrace these powerful words, should be permitted to serve.

Laws are meant to be argued and subsequently amended based on the pulse of the nation. With Jamaica's current state, any devoted individual who wishes to assist in reviving our land should not be chastised but applauded and embraced.

I am, etc.,

MARJHE D. CHANG

marjhe@hotmail.com

San Diego

California

Via Go-Jamaica