The Editor, Sir:

The debate concerning the introduction of casino gaming seems to be regaining much attention and the input of the Church is expected to play a major role.

However, I believe it is morally improper for the church to seek to influence legislation in this matter.

It is a fact that religion has contributed to more death and destruction in this world than all the plagues put together.

Recognising the possible social ills of religion, former Communist countries used legislation to prevent some churches from operating.

Do unto others ...

This was considered to be grossly unfair by those who wanted freedom to enjoy the benefits that they derive from participating in their religious activities. So much effort was put out to influence changes in such legislation.

Today, our churches and religious groups are free, despite the fact that among the various groups some still see the others as dangerous and worthy of being legislated against.

One of the fundamental principles of Christianity and many other religions is that we should do unto others as we would have them do unto us.

The question, therefore, is: Bearing in mind the devastating impact of religion on societies over the years and even to this day, should legislation be introduced to prohibit the operation of seeming dangerous religions and churches?

Casino gaming can never be as dangerous as religion, yet we would not want any reintroduction of legislation to take away the freedom to worship which we cherish so highly.

It is morally wrong for the church to do unto those who wish to have casino gaming what it would not want to be done to itself.

I am, etc.,

NEILSON ANDERSON

May Pen