THE EDITOR, Sir:
I BELIEVE that most leaders, especially those in the political arena, are endlessly beset by conflicting expectations, loyalties and demands from their followers. It is my opinion too, that it is only an ineffective leader who would allow him or herself to be intimidated and squeezed by conflicting political pressures, whether these pressures originate from those being served or those serving.
Every leader's action gives an indication or clue to the behaviour that is expected from the followers and subordinates. This is how it is in the private sector and how it could/should be in the Government and the public sector. In recent times, it would appear that quality leadership is being measured by "style and fashion" and the yardstick being used is devoid of anything of substance, value and quality.
MISLEADING THE PEOPLE
We have all become familiar with leaders who on occasions mingle with the 'people' in situations and with gestures meant to impart self assurance in their humane nature and personal identification with the 'masses'. All or most of these displays are for the most part either designed to counteract the impression others may have that they are impersonal, or to give some of us the feeling that they are flesh and blood leaders who are genuinely interested in the welfare of poor constituents.
If leaders set goals and standards and these are violated or not met, then it is the leader who should show authority and, where needed, must reprimand and censure as warranted. When there are infractions, it should not be business as usual, regardless of how the relationship between the leader and the follower may be cloaked or hidden in democratic principles and procedures.
I am, etc.,
SONIA CHRISTIE
Stewart Town, Trelawny
