Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

KRAAL TRIAL: DAY 21 - Scotland Yard report differs from expert's
published: Wednesday | November 30, 2005

Barbara Gayle, Staff Reporter

A FORENSIC scientist from New Scotland Yard has submitted a report whose findings differed from those of Government ballistics expert Daniel Wray.

This was in relation to tests conducted on firearms in connection to the Kraal case.

Yesterday Wray testified in the Home Circuit Court that the fragments of bullets recovered from the bodies of three of the four civilians at Kraal, Clarendon, came from an M-16 rifle. The rifle was handed to Wray by a policeman from the Bureau of Special Investigation. The M-16 rifle is an exhibit in court.

During cross-examination yesterday, defence lawyer Valerie Neita-Robertson showed Wray a section of a report from Mark Mastaglio of the Metropolitan Police Forensic Service at Scotland Yard.

RESULT INCONCLUSIVE

After reading the report, he was asked if Mastaglio believed his result was "inconclusive as it was not possible to determine which of the six guns from which the test fired bullets were derived had discharged the fragments", and Wray said he saw that in the report.

It was suggested to Wray that the fragments were in such a condition that his result would be inconclusive in relation to the M-16 rifle and he said that was not his opinion.

Wray said he examined a .45 pistol and M-16 rifle and came to the conclusion that they could not have been fired during the shooting incident at Kraal on May 7, 2003.

Evidence was given in court that these weapons were assigned to Senior Superintendent Reneto Adams.

Wray said he carried out tests on the 9mm Taurus semi-automatic pistol found at the crime scene at Kraal could have been fired on May 7, 2003.

Robin Keely, a senior forensic scientist from the United Kingdom, said he conducted tests on the clothes of the four deceased and found firearm discharge residue on them. He concluded that some of the victims must have been shot within close range and that was within a distance of two or three metres.

The Crown is alleging at the trial of SSP Adams and five other policemen that they were not acting in self-defence when the four civilians were fatally shot at Kraal.

More Lead Stories



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





































© Copyright 1997-2005 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner