Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Arts &Leisure
Outlook
In Focus
Social
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Other News
Stabroek News

Letter of the day - Read the fine print
published: Sunday | January 30, 2005

THE EDITOR, Sir:

THERE IS a massive disillusion in my immediate community, and, indeed, the wider Jamaica community regarding the inadequate settlement of claims to damaged houses following the ravages of the recent hurricane.

The insurance companies happily accept your coverage for houses without highlighting the conditions in the fineprints. Firstly, the unsuspecting clients are under the illusion that their annual coverage has a cumulative effect. When the clients point out that their remittance covers 16 years since 'Gilbert', the fine print, which nullify this claim comes into play.

Initially, you are asked to submit an estimate of cost from a builder and a photograph of the damaged building, all added to your cost. Eventually, an overseas 'assessor' appears, an em-ployee of some foreign company, to reduce your claims to a laughable minuscule.

'FOREIGN AGENT'

This 'foreign agent' treats you to a lecture that Jamaica is the worst uneducated country in the matter of insurance. He unveils a number of conditions to your claims which hardly cover your 'estimate' and photograph costs.

We are appealing for combined effort of the media, (newspapers, television, radio) and the relevant ministry of government to mount an effective public education campaign on this matter of insurance. It would be in the interest of the insurance companies themselves to mount their own education programme. There are many clients who will not return to them.

The argument is that it is better to place their remittances in some other investments. The availability of some funds are assured in a time of need.

Finally, why must the insurance companies employ some overseas 'assessors' to quantify our claims? Why not our own people?

I am, etc.,

ARTHUR S. BYFIELD

PO Box 2162

Boscobel P.O., St. Mary

More Letters | | Print this Page

















© Copyright 1997-2004 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions
Home - Jamaica Gleaner