Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Farmer's Weekly
Mind & Spirit
Builder's Forum
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Ja should have led the way
published: Saturday | March 6, 2004

THE EDITOR, Sir:

LET ME start by saying that the situation in Haiti is regrettable and would have been just as regrettable had Mr. Aristide remained in power.

The spiralling poverty, increasing violence, vigilantism, massive inequality between the extremely rich minority and the destitute majority are all symptoms of a series of governments that have let down the Haitian people as well as the legacy of the meddling by more affluent (read colonial) countries.

It should also be noted that this description, certainly to a lesser extent, could be used to describe Jamaica. Would those who advocate the removal of President Aristide also advocate the removal of Prime Minister Patterson? Certainly similar allegations can and have been made.

And in an absence of civil war (though this is debatable) we have managed to murder more people since the year began than have been killed in Haiti during a time of anarchy.

What would be our expectation of CARICOM or the US should one of the thugs we call dons decide to capture Montego Bay? To the extent that the police are unable to effectively police some communities in and around Kingston, could it not be said that this situation already exists to some extent?

So would we now expect US Marines to storm Jamaica House and "suggest" to Mr. Patterson that to prevent further bloodshed he flee the country?

I agree with the CARICOM leaders in their rejection of the notion of removing President Aristide. However when we point a finger at someone, we many times leave the other four pointing back at ourselves.

President Aristide begged for our assistance and we did not act. Does that not support the notion that many have of CARICOM as nothing but a talk shop? Certainly there is a cost to sending in peacekeeping troops; we were apparently willing to make that sacrifice in word but not in deed. And we are going to be paying a high cost for the steady stream of refugees to our shores long after this event passes.

A democratic Haiti existing under the rule of law has a better chance of survival and development than one which has the now firmly planted impression that if one is dissatisfied with government the recourse is resort to vigilante methods.

Jamaica, having a more mature democracy (another debate) should have acted as the older brother and stepped in, leading the rest of CARICOM. Perhaps the concern was the Haitians would retort 'Physician heal thyself!'.

I am, etc.,

BRUCE McNIGHT

bruce_mcknight@hotmail.com

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Via Go-Jamaica

More Letters | | Print this Page















©Copyright2003 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner