Wednesday | November 29, 2000
Home Page
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
Star Page

E-Financial Gleaner

Subscribe
Classifieds
Guest Book
Submit Letter
The Gleaner Co.
Advertising
Search

Go-Shopping
Question
Business Directory
Free Mail
Overseas Gleaner & Star
Kingston Live - Via Go-Jamaica's Web Cam atop the Gleaner Building, Down Town, Kingston
Discover Jamaica
Go-Chat
Go-Jamaica Screen Savers
Inns of Jamaica
Personals
Find a Jamaican
5-day Weather Forecast
Book A Vacation
Search the Web!

Unauthorised pay hike for 12 at EOJ

By Vernon Daley, Staff Reporter

THE ELECTORAL Office of Jamaica (EOJ) has been paying out nearly $2.5 million a year in increases to 12 employees whose salaries were jacked up in December 1998 without the approval of the Ministry of Finance and Planning.

The revelation came at yesterday's sitting of the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament (PAC), at which the Auditor General's report on the EOJ for the 1998/1999 financial year was examined.

However, Director of Elections Danville Walker justified increasing the salaries without the approval of the Ministry, arguing if this had not been done, the election body would have lost highly skilled information technologists whom it had trained.

Against this background, he said, the EOJ went to the Electoral Advisory Committee (EAC), the body that oversees election policies, to make a case to grant an increase to the 12 persons.

"The EAC took a position that we had spent a lot of money training our staff and we were not about to see them leave and therefore the EAC approved the salaries," Mr. Walker told the PAC. The EAC is awaiting the appointment of three independent members before resuming its sittings.

The EOJ boss explained that before the increase, a number of the employees had resigned because they were being paid below market rate and despite an ongoing review by the Finance Ministry of the salaries for information technologists in the public sector, at the time, it was not clear when salaries were likely to be increased.

In April last year, however, the Ministry completed its review and according to Mr. Walker the salaries of six of the 12 workers now fall within the new guidelines set while some of those whose pay exceeded the benchmark were placed on contract.

Committee chairman Audley Shaw questioned whether putting the employees on contract was a method of getting away from the guidelines set by the Ministry.

"I hope so, because I don't know that you can run the organisation without these people. I can't and therefore a way has to be found to retain them," Mr. Walker said.

Back to Lead Stories




















©Copyright 2000 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions